Hudson v. State
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Lockett, J.:
Pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4608(f)(5), petitioner Shelia' Hudson received no credit for time spent on parole on the aggregate sentence imposed when she committed a new offense while on parole. The district court granted relief under K.S.A. 60-1507, finding that the denial of credit was a violation of the United States Constitution’s prohibition against double jeopardy and its require ment of due process and that K.S.A. 21-4608(f)(5) conflicts with K.S.A. 22-3722.
Our question is whether K.S.A. 21-4608(f)(5) is unconstitutional as a violation of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. GaudinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- Anderson v. BruceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.