Legal Opinion

Hudson v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 15, 2002No. 86,437PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

Pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4608(f)(5), petitioner Shelia' Hudson received no credit for time spent on parole on the aggregate sentence imposed when she committed a new offense while on parole. The district court granted relief under K.S.A. 60-1507, finding that the denial of credit was a violation of the United States Constitution’s prohibition against double jeopardy and its require ment of due process and that K.S.A. 21-4608(f)(5) conflicts with K.S.A. 22-3722.

Our question is whether K.S.A. 21-4608(f)(5) is unconstitutional as a violation of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. GaudinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. Anderson v. BruceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API