Legal Opinion

United States v. Duane Douglas Lominac

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1998No. 96-4282PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MICHAEL, Circuit Judge:

Duane Lominac appeals from a sentence imposed for the violation of conditions of his supervised release. The district court revoked Lominac’s supervised release and sentenced him under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) and (h) to a six-month term of imprisonment to be followed by a new thirty-month term of supervised release. Lominac contends that this sentence violates the prohibition against ex post facto laws because (1) § 3583(h) was enacted after he committed his original felonies and (2) this new section increases the punishment for his original crimes. Because we…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Curtis O'NealCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Rob ShortyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. PettusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API