Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 26, 1955No. 6473PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BROSMAN, Judge:

The accused Army officer — formerly the provost marshal of a port unit located at Pusan, Korea — was found guilty under eleven specifications of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 715, and another alleging a violation of a lawful general regulation, contrary to the provisions of Article 92, 50 USC § 686. He was sentenced to be dismissed from the service, to forfeit all pay and allowances, and to be confined at hard labor for eight years.

The convening authority disapproved the findings of guilty returned…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. United States v. FlorenceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  5. United States v. KellumUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. DicarioUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. DrexlerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  3. United States v. JobesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. SwigertUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. United States v. HallUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API