United States v. Drexler
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:
Determining that the charges on which the accused was convicted were multiplicious, a board of review dismissed the less serious charge and reassessed the sentence. The Judge Advocate General has certified the case to this Court for review of the following question:
“Was the action of the Board of Review in setting aside the finding on Charge II correct as a matter of law?”
An act which constitutes but a single offense should not be made the basis for several charges. To meet the exigencies of proof, the Government may properly allege one offense…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Dealy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. StrandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. NeradCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. TetersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. DossUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.