Legal Opinion

United States v. Hall

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 16, 1955No. 7117PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BROSman, Judge:

An Army general court-martial found the appellant here guilty under two specifications alleging larceny — in violation of. Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 715. Both were concerned with the theft of clothing said to have been taken on the same date. Hall’s sentence to dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures and confinement at hard labor for one year — together with all findings — were approved by the convening authority and affirmed by a board of review. We granted review to determine the single question of whether the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Morgan v. DevineSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. United States v. McVeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. BeeneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. FlorenceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. JobesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  2. United States v. SwigertUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. LovejoyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  4. United States v. RidgewayU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  5. United States v. CollinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API