Legal Opinion

In Re Greenlee

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 2006No. 200,294-3PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

143 P.3d 807 (2006)

In re the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceeding Against A. Graham GREENLEE, Bar No. 890, an Attorney at Law.

No. 200,294-3.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued May 11, 2006.

Decided October 5, 2006.

Phillip H. Ginsberg, Attorney at Law, Seattle, for Petitioner/Appellant.

Kevin M Bank, Washington State Bar Association, Seattle, for Appellee/Respondent.

J.M. JOHNSON, J.

¶ 1 Mr. A. Graham Greenlee appeals the findings and conclusions of the Disciplinary Board (Board) of the Washington State Bar Association (Bar) that he violated former RPC 1.8(h) (2000). The Board's decision…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Restaurant Development, Inc. v. Cananwill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Restaurant Development, Inc. v. Cananwill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplin. Proceeding Against CramerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against CramerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In Re Disciplinary Proc. Against CramerWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against CramerWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Rafel Law Group PLLC v. DefoorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API