Legal Opinion

In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Cramer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 2010No. 200,674-4PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtC. Johnson, J.

¶1 This case involves an attorney who, when faced with revocation of his business license by the Department of Revenue (DOR), notified DOR he was ceasing his business but instead re-formed his practice from a “PLLC” to an “Inc. PS” and continued to operate. The attorney failed to notify DOR of his new status and removed the revocation order posted at his office. The hearing officer and the Washington State Bar Association’s (WSBA) Disciplinary Board (Board) concluded that this conduct was dishonest, illegal, deceitful, and a misrepresentation of his intention to circumvent his tax liabilities…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against CohenWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against CohenWashington Supreme Court · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Disc. Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee v. Thomas Ewing CowanTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In Re Proceeding Against FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API