Bolden v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LUDWIG, District Judge.
Following a jury verdict of $250,001 in favor of plaintiff Russell Bolden, defendant SEPTA moves for judgment as a matter óf law, 1 or for full remittitur, 2 or for new trial. 3 Fed.R.Civ.P. 50, 59.
Plaintiff, a former SEPTA employee, was discharged in August, 1987 after testing positive for marijuana. 4 Almost a year later, in May of 1988, Local 234 of the Transport Workers Union and SEPTA negotiated a settlement of Bolden’s grievance. Plaintiff would be re-instated upon passing a drug test and either participating in a rehabilitation program or undergoing…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Memphis Community School District v. StachuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- George Parrish and Charles Giles v. Perry Johnson, Charles Anderson, K.L. Cole, and Clarence TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Borrell v. Bloomsburg UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- King v. Port Authority of New York and New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Bolden v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Paolella v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Pica v. SarnoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.