Bolden v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
We revisit a case which had come before us in banc and which we had remanded for a new trial on damages. Now, after the trial on remand, we confront a contention that the jury verdict was inconsistent with the law of the case as established by our in banc opinion in the first appeal. We conclude that the jury’s verdict can be reconciled with our prior ruling, and that the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to support the jury’s award. We must also decide whether expert medical testimony is required to prove emotional distress damages in a case brought pursuant to…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Memphis Community School District v. StachuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Burnett v. GrattanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Donald Hogan v. Bangor and Aroostook Railroad Company, Donald Hogan v. Bangor and Aroostook Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Borrell v. Bloomsburg UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Padilla v. MillerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Padilla v. MillerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.