Legal Opinion
Borrell v. Bloomsburg University
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 19, 2016No. CASE NO. 3:12-CV-2123PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
A. Richard Caputo, United States District Judge
Presently before me are Defendant Dr. Michelle Ficca’s (“Dr. Ficca”) Post Trial Motions (Doc. 255) and Defendants Geis-inger Medical Center (“GMC”) and Arthur Richer’s (“Mr. Richer”) (collectively “Geis-inger Defendants”) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or New Trial or Remit-titur. (Doc. 257) Because Dr. Ficca is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Ms. Borrell’s due process claim and property interest claim and Dr. Ficca is not entitled to qualified immunity, her motion will be denied. Further, because Plaintiff Angela…
2Cases cited106 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ponzini v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Rayna P. v. Campus Cmty. Sch.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
- In re MarinariUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Clemens v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- A.B. v. Pleasant Valley School DistricCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.