Legal Opinion
Robzen's Inc. v. US Dept. of Housing
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 31, 1981No. Civ. 79-1477PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEALON, Chief Judge.
I. FACTS
This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Robzen’s, Inc., claims the right to compensation for “moving and related expenses” incurred during a forced relocation from Wilkes Barre to Scranton pursuant to a condemnation of the company’s real property in 1977. The principal defendant, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), argues that the complainant has already received all appropriate payments authorized under state and federal law. Resolution of the controversy requires a careful review…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Energenics Systems, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- In Re Northampton Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Antonio Pou Pacheco, D/B/A Torrefaccion Mi Tacita, Pou De Pou, Ilba Maida, and Their Conjugal Partnership v. Carlos Soler Aquino, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Malone v. DIV. OF ADMIN., STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.