Legal Opinion

Antonio Pou Pacheco, D/B/A Torrefaccion Mi Tacita, Pou De Pou, Ilba Maida, and Their Conjugal Partnership v. Carlos Soler Aquino, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 18, 1987No. 86-1991PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

This case comes to us on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. Following a jury trial, Judge Acosta ordered appellants to compensate appellees under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (URA or Relocation Act), 42 U.S.C. § 4601 et seq., as follows:

for dismantling $ 10,000

for moving expenses $ 9,000

for rental expenses (storage) $ 70,000

for search costs $ 55,000

for reinstallation of machinery and equipment $102,600

for value of new equipment and machinery $393,300

plus costs. Pacheco v.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Employees of Department of Public Health v. Department of Public HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Parden v. Terminal Railway of Alabama State Docks DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Great Northern Life Insurance Co. v. ReadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Delancey v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. Rollock Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. The M/V Cape Ann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. Union Ele. & Ware. Co., Inc. v. State Ex Rel. DotCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Union Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API