Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 5, 1995No. 34, 1994PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice:

In this appeal we consider several claims of error raised by defendant below-appellant, Frederick W. Smith (“Smith”), who was convicted by a Superior Court jury of second degree unlawful sexual intercourse, third degree unlawful sexual penetration, and third degree assault. Smith contends that the Superior Court erred in: (i) admitting medical records that had been redacted by the prosecutor; (ii) refusing to admit a portion of Smith’s statement to the police; (iii) admitting prior “bad acts” evidence; (iv) admitting the victim’s tape recorded statement pursuant to 11 Del.C. §…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  2. Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  3. Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  4. Keys v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
  5. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  3. Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  4. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  5. Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API