Smith v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
BERGER, Justice:
In this appeal we consider several claims of error raised by defendant below-appellant, Frederick W. Smith (“Smith”), who was convicted by a Superior Court jury of second degree unlawful sexual intercourse, third degree unlawful sexual penetration, and third degree assault. Smith contends that the Superior Court erred in: (i) admitting medical records that had been redacted by the prosecutor; (ii) refusing to admit a portion of Smith’s statement to the police; (iii) admitting prior “bad acts” evidence; (iv) admitting the victim’s tape recorded statement pursuant to 11 Del.C. §…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
- Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Keys v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. ClarkHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.