Burns v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
RIDGELY, Justice:
Robert Burns was convicted by a Superior Court jury of several counts of varying degrees of sexual assault against children. We have affirmed Burns’ conviction on direct appeal.1 Now, Burns seeks post-conviction relief and argues that he received inadequate assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Burns claims his trial counsel erred in the following ways: by not affirmatively recommending Burns take an plea deal, by eliciting testimony from an adverse witness that could have implied Burns invoked his Fifth Amendment right…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Urquhart v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
- Brisco v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2023
- Elder v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2024
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.