Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Forest County State Bank

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.

This case comes here as a continuation of the litigation considered in Forest County v. Poppy, 193 Wis. 274, 213 N. W. 676. The facts are not in dispute. As related in that case, and found in this case, Poppy was county treasurer of Forest county. He was required to *562make deposits of funds of the county in county depositories designated as such by the county board. This he neglected and refused to do until commanded by the judgment of the circuit court. After some delay he went to the First National Bank of Crandon, where he had county funds on deposit, and secured a blank check or draft,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Ross v. Northrup, King & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Aebi v. Bank of EvansvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Equitable Trust Co. v. RochlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Forest County v. PoppyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. HenningSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  2. Endlich v. Bank of Black CreekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Fredonia Canning Co. v. Sergeant & Nicholoy, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API