Equitable Trust Co. v. Rochling
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
Respondents, bankers of Frankfort-on-Main, maintained a general deposit account with the bankrupts, who were private bankers in New York City. On instruction of Lloyds Bank, Ltd., London, which was requested by respondents “ to procure this amount for us ” on June 15, 1923, “ at Knauth, Nachod & Kuhne, New York,” the National Bank of Commerce in New York on that day delivered to Knauth, Nachod & Kuhne, the bankrupts, its cashier’s check for $30,000 payable to their order “ for account of Rochling Bank, Gebt. Frankfort-on-Main,” and took from them their receipt for the check “ for account of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- White v. StumpSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Commercial Bank of Pa. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Minot v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Carson v. Federal Reserve BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Keyes v. Paducah & IR Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Meehan v. North Adams Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Joffrion-Woods, Inc. v. St. James Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.