Fredonia Canning Co. v. Sergeant & Nicholoy, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The facts are not in dispute. The parties have had business dealings over a period of at least fifteen years. The functions of the broker — field and resident— and the trade practices and customs in the business clearly establish the scope and extent of the brokers’ agency.
It appears that in the summer of 1931, Mr. Engle, the president of the defendant company, called at the plaintiff’s factory at Fredonia in company with one Mr. Lachman, a resident broker engaged in business at Chicago'. Mr. Engle introduced Mr. Lachman to1 Mr. Meyer, president of the plaintiff company, as his associate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ross v. Northrup, King & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Hansche v. A. J. Conroy, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Parr v. Northern Electrical Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Smith v. StarkeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Ames v. D. J. Murray Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sell v. General Electric Supply Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938