Endlich v. Bank of Black Creek
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.
Doubtless the plaintiff should have recovered on its complaint against the Bank of Black Creek. The deposit in that bank constituted it the debtor of the plaintiff. In order to discharge this debt it was incumbent on the bank to pay the amount thereof to some one authorized to receive it. It is elementary that payment to a person having no right to receive the money does not discharge the debt. Lochenmeyer v. Fogarty, 112 Ill. 572; McMahon v. German-American Nat. Bank, 111 Minn. 313, 127 N. W. 7; 29 L. R. A.n. s. 67. It is not claimed that Behnke had authority to indorse the certificate or to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First Nat. Bank v. United States Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Aebi v. Bank of EvansvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Lochenmeyer v. FogartyIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Evenson v. Waukesha National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- McMahon v. German-American National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Behring International, Inc. v. Greater Houston Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
- Wussow v. Badger State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- United Virginia Bank v. E. L. B. Tank Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Wisconsin General Finance Corp. v. Park Savings BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Ertman v. Liberty State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932