Legal Opinion

Beggs v. City of Portales

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2007No. 26,903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

{1} Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant on Plaintiffs’ petition for declaratory judgment and breach of contract claim. Plaintiffs are fourteen retired employees of Defendant City of Portales (City) who are challenging the City’s decision to discontinue partial reimbursement of retiree health care insurance premiums. Below, the district court concluded that summary judgment was appropriate because Plaintiffs had no contractual or vested rights in the payment of retiree health insurance benefits. We agree and affirm.

BA…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Dodge v. Board of Ed. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beggs v. City of PortalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Beggs v. City of PortalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Oliver v. Meow Wolf, IncDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API