Legal Opinion

Desjardins v. Auburn Steel Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Because plaintiff sustained his injury when he was struck by a crane and not as the result of a fall from a height or being struck by a falling object, Supreme Court erred in denying defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiff’s Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action (see, Oakes v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 176 AD2d 1240). Therefore, plaintiff’s Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action must be dismissed.

The court, however, properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nagel v. MetzgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Lozo v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Oakes v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ruiz v. 8600 Roll Road, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API