Legal Opinion

Zeitinger v. Hargadine-Mckittrick Dry Goods Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 28, 1923PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This is an appeal from the finding and judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, allowing the intervener, Avho is the respondent here, the sum of $5,000 for his services rendered as at: torney to the- Hargadine-McKittrick Dry Goods Company. The services consisted in the efforts of the in-tervener to have the company at the instance of its directors, declared a bankrupt about the time or just after a receiver had been appointed for the company by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. Subsequently the receivership proceedings were pending upon an appeal by the company before…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Morton ex rel. Richardson v. Supreme Council of the Royal LeagueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Rocca v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Woolfolk v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  5. O'Fallon v. CloptonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Check v. KaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. Duggan v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  3. BANKERS'MORTG. CO. OF TOPEKA, KAN. v. McCombCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Monticello Building Corp. v. Monticello Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. Meadowbrook Country Club v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API