Meadowbrook Country Club v. Davis
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
EAGER, Judge.
This case was transferred here by our order from the St. Louis Court of Appeals. After consideration, we have arrived at the same result as that Court did and, generally, through the same conclusions. Since the matter involved was one of general interest, we felt that this review was appropriate. We have adopted some of the language of the Court of Appeals without quotations.
The case involves the application and validity of Rule 3K of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County which is as follows: “Any party desiring a trial by jury of an appeal from the Magistrate Court or Municipal…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Barker v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Vaughn v. ScadeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
- Meadowbrook Country Club v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Merrill v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- State v. McClintonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Diehl v. O'MALLEYSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Malan Realty Investors, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Holm v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2017
- Savannah Place, Ltd. v. HeidelbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re S____ M____ W____Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.