Legal Opinion

Rocca v. Thompson

California Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1910No. Sac. No. 1669PublishedCited by 25 opinions

■ The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Ambrose Gherini, Clary & Loutitt, and R. K. Barrows, for Appellant. John E. Budd, and Budd & Thompson, for Respondent. Cullinan & Hickey, and John J. O’Toole, Amici Curiæ, for Respondent.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Salvatore L. Rocca appeals from an order of the superior court granting to George F. Thompson, as public administrator of San Joaquin County, letters of administration upon the estate of Giuseppe Ghio, deceased, and refusing the application of said appellant for such letters.

The appeal was submitted to the district court of appeal of the third district and decided in favor of the respondent. A rehearing in the supreme court was ordered, because, as treaty rights were involved, it was deemed advisable that the highest state court should consider the matter.

Giuseppe Ghio, at the time of his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Geofroy v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Horn v. Volcano Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  3. McEvoy v. WymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  4. In re the Estate of LobrascianoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1902
  5. In re the Application for Letters of Administration on the Estate of FattosiniNew York Surrogate's Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Strickland Ex Rel. Steed v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. In Re the Estate of D'AdamoNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Schneider v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  5. Austro-Hungarian Consul v. G. A. WestphalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API