Application of State of California
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
GANEY, Chief Judge.
This is a motion for leave to inspect and copy grand jury subpoenas, both duces tecum and ad testificandum, which arose out of a number of criminal indictments which charged practically all of the leading manufacturers of heavy electrical equipment with violations of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq.
Five separate grand juries, during varying periods of time, heard the evidence, and approximately 440 subpoenas duces tecum and approximately 70 subpoenas ad testificandum were served. These subpoenas duces tecum covered products which were the subject of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Shotwell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- In the Matter of the April 1956 Term Grand Jury. Byron A. Cain and Sally Cain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Metzler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Minnesota v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- United States v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- City of Philadelphia v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company v. City of Fort Pierce, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Hancock Brothers, Inc. v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1968
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.