Legal Opinion
United States v. General Electric Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 22, 1962No. Civ. A. 29379, 29488-29490, 30297, 29491-29493PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAFT, District Judge.
Following a grand jury investigation of the electrical equipment industry, the Government instituted these civil actions for damages under the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 12 et seq. and the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C.A. § 231 et seq. 1 Tennessee Valley Authority is co-plaintiff in five of the suits.
The cases are now before us on three motions by defendants, all of which will be considered and disposed of in one opinion.
Defendants’ first motion is to impound grand jury minutes and documents and for allied relief. We are called upon to determine the validity of the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. Director of Internal RevenueDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation No. 78-184. Sells, Inc., Peter A. Sells, Fred R. Witte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Kansas City, Missouri v. Federal Pacific Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- In re Grand Jury Investigation William H. Pflaumer & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- In Re Paul Perlin, a Witness Before the April 1977 Grand Jury, Paul PerlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.