Legal Opinion
Burns v. Essling
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 19, 1923No. 23,009PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C-
Appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint, the trial court having certified that the question presented was important and doubtful.
*305The action was brought by plaintiff in behalf of himself and other taxpayers in the city of Eveleth to compel the mayor and councilmen to restore to the city $74,601.54, alleged to have been wrongfully appropriated out of the public funds of the city by these officers. The complaint alleged that there are no city officers having-authority to bring actions in behalf of the city except those named as defendants. The sureties on the bonds of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stone v. BevansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Borough of Henderson v. County of SibleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- City of Chaska v. HedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Rothwell v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Bailey v. StrachanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Regan v. BabcockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Grudnosky v. BislowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Sheel v. IngramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Muirhead v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- STATE EX. REL. SHOLES v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.