Rothwell v. Robinson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Simons, J., presiding, overruling their demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
There are a good many allegations in the complaint that are no ground for a court to afford any relief to plaintiff; that amount indeed to no more than expressions of discontent on the part of a stockholder in a corporation, at being excluded by the majority of the stock from the management of its business, and .at the business being conducted in a manner not approved by him. But *2the allegations that the defendant Eobinson (who, as is alleged, is therein aided by the defendants Hemenway and Dunn, the stock being all held by plaintiff and those three,) has employed the business of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jones v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
3Cited by17 opinions
- Horn Silver Mining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Red Bud Realty Co. v. SouthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Winter v. Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Gross Iron Ore Co. v. PaulleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- National Power & Paper Co. v. RossmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.