Muirhead v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment entered upon an order dismissing the action of plaintiff taxpayer, as well as that of the city of Hastings as an intervener.
Prior appeals herein were dismissed because they were taken from a nonappealable order. See, Muirhead v. Johnson, 231 Minn. 567, 42 N. W. (2d) 318.
In April 1949, plaintiff, as a taxpayer, brought an action on behalf of himself and others to set aside a conveyance by the city of Hastings to defendants of certain real estate alleged to have been conveyed through false representations for a grossly inadequate consideration. Defendants…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Meyer v. BerlandiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Brown v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- Hemsley v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
- Ex parte MunfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. VerschingelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Thorgaard Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc. v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Lang v. William Bros Boiler & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Har-Mar, Incorporated v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Bellows v. EricsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Lucas v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.