Legal Opinion

Vincent v. Rent Control Board of Cambridge

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 2, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

There is a controlling date: January 1, 1969. On that date unit no. 1 in 109 Windsor Street, Cambridge, was lawfully in use as a neighborhood health clinic. Unit no. 2 became incorporated in the health clinic later, on August 1, 1969, and Unit no. 4, later still, on April 1, 1971. At those times, Cambridge did not require a permit to remove premises from residential use. In the summer of 1976, the clinic moved out of 109 Windsor Street and the three units underwent conversion to apartments. The question for decision is whether the resulting apartments are subject to rent control or whether…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Finkelstein v. Board of Registration in OptometryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Flynn v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Martin v. Rent Control Board of CambridgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. Rogers v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Figueiredo v. Rent Control BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  2. Valentine v. Rent Control BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API