Finkelstein v. Board of Registration in Optometry
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtReardon, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment affirming a decision of the Board of Registration in Optometry (board), which suspended his license as a practicing optometrist.
There is no dispute on the facts which appear to be as follows. During weekdays, with the exception of one day off, the plaintiff engaged in practice as a registered optometrist between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. in an office located in Brockton. Between the hours of 6 and 10 p.m. daily he engaged in the business of a licensed dispensing optician at Berk’s department store in Raynham where he was the proprietor of an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Cleary v. Cardullo's, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Budd Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Gerosa, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Westvaco Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- United States v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Gurry v. Board of Public AccountancyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Warcewicz v. Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Foster from Gloucester, Inc. v. City Council of GloucesterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.