Legal Opinion

Finkelstein v. Board of Registration in Optometry

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 11, 1976PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReardon, J.

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment affirming a decision of the Board of Registration in Optometry (board), which suspended his license as a practicing optometrist.

There is no dispute on the facts which appear to be as follows. During weekdays, with the exception of one day off, the plaintiff engaged in practice as a registered optometrist between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. in an office located in Brockton. Between the hours of 6 and 10 p.m. daily he engaged in the business of a licensed dispensing optician at Berk’s department store in Raynham where he was the proprietor of an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Cleary v. Cardullo's, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  3. Budd Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Gerosa, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Westvaco Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. United States v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Gurry v. Board of Public AccountancyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Warcewicz v. Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Foster from Gloucester, Inc. v. City Council of GloucesterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API