Legal Opinion
Martin v. Rent Control Board of Cambridge
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided April 30, 1985PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, C.J.
This is an appeal by the rent control board of Cambridge from a judgment of the Superior Court which determined that property owned by Felipe S. Martin at 109-111 Henry Street is an owner-occupied three-family house exempt from St. 1976, c. 36, the Cambridge Rent Control Act (Act).
The facts are not in dispute. In 1976, Martin purchased the property at 109-111 Henry Street. The property is an apartment building consisting of four units, two on each side of the building. At the time of purchase, Martin, his wife, and two children moved into unit two at 111 Henry Street which occupies the second…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Marshal House, Inc. v. Rent Control Board of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Flynn v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Nantucket Conservation Foundation, Inc. v. Russell Management, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Powell v. Time InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Singer Friedlander Corp. v. State Lottery CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- City of Leominster v. International Brotherhood of Police OfficersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Tsagronis v. Board of Appeals of WarehamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. JaffeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.