Tomlinson v. Briles
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The evidence shows, without conflict, that work was done by the appellee in grading the bed of a railroad, and the only conflict in the evidence was as to whom •the appellee had a right to look for compensation. As there was no conflict in the evidence upon the question of performance of the work, no harm was done the appellant by the first instruction which left out the element of performance in stating the facts which it was incumbent upon him to' prove. Had there been any conflict in the evidence as to whether the appellee did do the work, then the instruction would have been erroneous,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- High v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Board of Commissioners v. ShipleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Pulse v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Stagg v. ComptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Gordon v. GordonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Higham v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Board of Commissioners v. Cincinnati Steam Heating Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Gorrell v. Home Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Moore v. OhlIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.