Legal Opinion
Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Reynolds
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1889No. 13,615PublishedCited by 31 opinions
From the Carroll Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
The basis of the contract under which the appellees rendered professional services for the appellant is the following letter :
“ Gentlemen — Enclosed please find passes No. 253, A. W. Reynolds, and 254, E. B. Sellers, which are in full compensation for services that your firm may be called upon to render in White county during 1884, except for assisting in trials of cases against the company other than stock cases; for such services, if rendered, you are to receive reasonable attorney’s fees, in addition to enclosed passes.”
During the years 1884 and 1885 the appellees rendered services in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chicago v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Waldhier v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
- Mescall v. TullyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Reissner v. OxleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Willcuts v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. DolanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Board of Commissioners v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- City of Vincennes v. Citizens' Gas Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Mussellem v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Roush v. RoushIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.