Legal Opinion
Doe v. United States Civil Service Commission
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 16, 1980No. 78 Civ. 131 (CHT)PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
In this factually straightforward but legally complex case, plaintiff Jane Doe 1 seeks declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief against the United States Civil Service Commission (“CSC”) and three CSC officials for injuries allegedly sustained as a result of an authorized government investigation of Doe conducted by the CSC. The complaint alleges several statutory and constitutional claims against the agency and the three named defendants in their official, as well as individual, capacities. These claims raise some unresolved and novel issues that pit the…
2Cases cited172 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Richard C. Bartel v. Federal Aviation Administration Richard C. Bartel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Jane Doe v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Bailey v. KirkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- John Doe v. Stanley S. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Walentas v. LipperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.