Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Kirk
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 14, 1985No. 82-1417PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
On November 14, 1980, plaintiff Garlin M. Bailey commenced this action against defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking redress for alleged constitutional violations that occurred when he was suspended without pay and demoted from his position as Chief of Police of the…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Woodward v. City of WorlandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Thomas B. Hennigh v. City of Shawnee, Terry Powell, and Hank LandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Phillips v. CalhounCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Dick Dickeson and Beth Weaver v. Deloyd Quarberg and the Board of County Commissioners of Hot Springs County, WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Hogue v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.