Legal Opinion
IQ Products Company v. Pandora Mfg Inc, et
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 23, 2002No. 01-20764PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff IQ Products Co. brought suit against defendants Pandora Manufacturing, Inc. (formerly known as Snap Products, Inc.) and Pennzoil Products Co., alleging that defendants falsely advertised their competing tire inflator product, Fix-A-Flat, in violation of the Lanham Act. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants. For the reasons given below, we affirm.
I
This case involves competing tire inflator products. Plaintiff IQ Products Co. (“IQ”) manufactures tire inflators under the brand names Repair Safe, AirUp, and Primis. Defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Richardson-Vicks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Pizza Hut, Inc. v. Papa John's International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- St. Martin v. Mobil Exploration & Producing U.S. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Blow v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Harold H. Huggins Realty, Inc. v. FNC, INC.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- PBM PRODUCTS, LLC v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Scott v. Metropolitan Health Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Astoria Industries of Iowa, Inc. v. SNF, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- PhotoMedex, Inc. v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.