Legal Opinion

Van Vorst v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided March 9, 1931No. Docket No. 43567Published

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE W. VAN VORST, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF C. B. VAN VORST, DECEASED, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Van Vorst v. Commissioner

Docket No. 43567.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

22 B.T.A. 632; 1931 BTA LEXIS 2096;

March 9, 1931, Promulgated

George H. Koster, Esq., and Claude I. Parker, Esq., for the petitioner.

M. B. Leming, Esq., for the respondent.

MURDOCK

OPINION.

MURDOCK: The Commissioner determined a deficiency of $26,720.79 in the decedent's income tax liability for the year 1924. The petitioner alleges that the Commissioner erred in including in the gross…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. LaBelle Iron Works v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Rockefeller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Peabody v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API