Legal Opinion

Peabody v. Eisner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 3, 1918No. 705PublishedCited by 92 opinions

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney

This case arose under the Federal Income Tax Act of October 3, 1913, c. 16, 38 Stat. 114, 166. The controversy is over the first causé of action set up by plaintiff in error in a suit against the Collector for the recovery of an additional tax exacted in respect of a certain dividend received by plaintiff in the year 1914, the facts being as follows: On and prior to March 1, 1913, and thenceforward until payment of the dividend in question, plaintiff was owner of 1,100 shares (out of a total of 2,000,000 shares outstanding) of common stock of the Union Pacific Railroad Company, of the par…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. United States v. PhellisSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Edwards v. DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API