Legal Opinion

Symington v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1996No. Civil 950312PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

Phyllis Symington appealed from a district court judgment affirming a Workers Compensation Bureau order denying benefits for a shoulder injury. We conclude a reasoning mind reasonably could have found, as the Bureau did, that Symington’s shoulder problem was not related to a work injury, and we affirm.

I

On October 22, 1991, Symington, a dietary aide at Pembina County Memorial Hospital, filed a claim for benefits with the Bureau. Symington said she injured her right knee in a fall in a walk-in freezer on September 8, 1991. The Bureau accepted liability for the knee injury and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Power Fuels, Inc. v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Otto v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Lambott v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hopfauf v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Negaard-Cooley v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Dean v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Geck v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Baldock v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API