Baldock v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

MARING, Justice.

Jeffrey Baldock appealed from a district court judgment upholding the deMal of additional benefits to Baldock by the North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau (the Bureau). We hold the 1992 limitations on vocational rehabilitation retraining benefits, under Section 65-05.1-01, N.D.C.C., did not violate Baldock’s equal protection rights under the federal or state constitutions. We also hold the Bureau’s finding that Baldock’s *443employer offered him a legitimate post-injury position is supported by a preponderance of the evidence, and we affirm the judgment.

On August 14, 1992,…