Legal Opinion

McLendon v. Frost

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1876PublishedCited by 9 opinions

New trial. Auditor. Practice in the Superior Court. Amendment. Witness. Evidence. Continuance. Pleadings. Jury. Usury. Admissions. Charge of court. Practice in the Supreme Court. Appropriation of payments. Debtor and creditor. Before Judge Crawford. Troup Superior Court.

Read the full summary

New trial. Auditor. Practice in the Superior Court. Amendment. Witness. Evidence. Continuance. Pleadings. Jury. Usury. Admissions. Charge of court. Practice in the Supreme Court. Appropriation of payments. Debtor and creditor. Before Judge Crawford. Troup Superior Court. November Term, 1875. On April 27tb, 1875, Frost brought complaint against McLendon on the following obligations: Due-bill for $1,000 00, dated September 30th, 1865. Due-bill for $654 61, dated May 26th, 1870, with credits thereon amounting to $178 60. Promissory note, dated April 26th, 1873, due one day after date, for $638…

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Judge.

The decision, as delivered from the bench, is set out in the twenty-one. head-notes. These notes were carefully considered, and are so full that they speak all we can usefully say touching the case or any part of it.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. PilcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Cutis v. GeigerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  4. Casteel v. Allgood-Frey-Shaw Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Howard, Weil, Labouisse, Fredericks, Inc. v. AbercrombieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API