Legal Opinion
Casteel v. Allgood-Frey-Shaw Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 12, 1923No. 14614PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. A ground of a motion for a new trial assigning error on the action of the court in permitting a witness to answer a certain question, which does not disclose the answer objected to, presents no question for determination. Southern Ry. Co. v. Wright, 6 Ga. App. 175 (64 S. E. 703); Smith v. State, 119 Ga. 113 (46 S. E. 79); City of Moultrie v. Cook, 11 Ga. App. 649 (1) (75 S. E. 991).
2. Where on the trial of an action for the purchase-price of goods charged to the defendant but delivered to another the evidence makes a ease of sales wholly on the authority, written or verbal, of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Cordray v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- McLendon v. FrostSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- City of Moultrie v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- Howard, Weil, Labouisse, Fredericks, Inc. v. AbercrombieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Management Recruiters of Atlanta North, Inc. v. J & B SMITH COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Christian v. Wood Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Tatum v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923