Legal Opinion

Cutis v. Geiger

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 14, 1933No. 9187PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. A judge of the superior court has jurisdiction to revoke or modify an order approving the grounds of a motion for a new trial, at any time while the motion is still pending before him and until the bill of exceptions is certified. Vanover v. Turner, 41 Ga. 577 (2) ; Ford v. Holmes, 61 Ga. 419 (5); Tate v. Griffith, 83 Ga. 153 (2) (9 S. E. 719); Keys v. Bell, 111 Ga. 795 (36 S. E. 967) ; Tifton &c. Ry. Co. v. Chastain, 122 Ga. 250 (3) (50 S. E. 105); Alexander v. Barrett, 134 Ga. 676 (4) (68 S. E. 503) ; Pryor v. Pryor, 162 Ga. 148 (132 S. E. 895) ; Atlanta & Birmingham Railway v. McManus,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. McLean v. MannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  3. Atlanta & Birmingham Air-Line Railway v. McManusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Nicol & Davidson v. CrittendenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  5. Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  3. Matthews v. BlanosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. Bonaparte v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  5. Pyle v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API