Legal Opinion
Howard, Weil, Labouisse, Fredericks, Inc. v. Abercrombie
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 12, 1976No. 53070PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
1. All enumerations of error except one deal basically with the same subject matter. The evidence developed that the home office of the brokerage firm was in New Orleans, while that with which the plaintiff dealt was in Gainesville, Ga. Abercrombie was an active trader on margin, with committed deliveries in some instances in excess of $2,000,000. Abercrombie was acquainted with another customer, Harry Waters; in relation to an inactive account, H & H Poultry Co., they had jointly talked with Slaton, who handled Waters’ affairs with the company, were told it could be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coldwell Co. v. CowartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Ross v. W. P. Stephens Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Cruse v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- McLendon v. FrostSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Southern Coal & Coke Co. v. RandallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- B. J. Howard Corp. v. Skinner, Wilson & StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Arabi Gin Co. v. Plexus Cotton, Ltd. (In re Joseph Walker & Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
- Management Recruiters of Atlanta North, Inc. v. J & B SMITH COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- General Gmc Trucks, Inc. And General Leasing, Inc. v. Mercury Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983