Legal Opinion
In Re B.C.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 2014No. 2013-1932 and 2014-0181PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*56Lanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} The issue in this appeal is whether due process requires that a parent whose parental rights have been terminated be afforded the right to a delayed appeal from the judgment of termination, comparable to the delayed appeal afforded to certain defendants by App.R. 5(A). We hold that due process does not entitle the parent in such a case to file a delayed appeal.
Case Background
{¶ 2} On October 25, 2011, appellee, Family and Children Services of Clark County (“FCSCC”) was granted an ex parte order to remove B.C., d.o.b. 5/4/2010, from the care of his mother, the appellant. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- In re K.W., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Highland County2018
- In re N.M.P. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Barrow v. New MiamiOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- In re A.M. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Asamoah v. SYGMA Network, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.