Legal Opinion

Reeves v. First National Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1912No. Civ. No. 1074PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order denying a new trial. William H. Waste, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for three hundred dollars damages, and also from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The action was brought to recover damages claimed to have been sustained by the plaintiffs because of the defendant’s failure to pay on presentation two certain checks, aggregating approximately one hundred dollars, there being on deposit to the credit of plaintiffs sufficient funds to meet them.

Defendant contends that there is no evidence to support the findings of the court (1st) that the checks were in form…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Melcher v. BeelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  2. Schaffner v. EhrmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  3. J. M. James Co. v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Ralph v. LockwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Rosewater v. HoffmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hydrotech Systems, Ltd. v. Oasis WaterparkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Weaver v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Grant v. WeatherholtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Rubino v. Utah Canning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Allen v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API