Patton v. Fortuna Corporation
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARMODY, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal of their complaint, which sought to declare the state racing statutes unconstitutional, and to enjoin the defendant from using certain premises for pari-mutuel betting on horse racing.
Although plaintiffs vigorously attack the constitutionality of the statute, the question first to be determined is whether plaintiffs have any standing in court to question the act.
We have many times held that the constitutionality of a legislative act is open to attack only by a person whose rights are affected thereby. Asplund v. Alarid, Assessor of Santa…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Asplund v. HannettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- Asplund v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- In Re Hickok's WillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
- Tomlin v. Town of Las CrucesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- Kuhn v. BurroughsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Baird v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. HinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Overton v. New Mexico State Tax CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Pueblo of Santa Ana v. HodelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Los Alamos Assessor v. State Tax CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.