Legal Opinion
Pueblo of Santa Ana v. Hodel
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 1, 1987No. Civ. A. 85-2866PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Senior District Judge:
In this proceeding, the Pueblo of Santa Ana (“Pueblo”), an Indian tribe, challenges a decision of the Secretary, Department of Interior (“Secretary”) denying its proposal to construct and operate a dog racing facility on its reservation that would allow parimutuel wagering. The proposal was rejected on grounds it violated the Assimila-tive Crimes Act (“ACA” or “Act”), 18 U.S.C. § 13. That statute, incorporating state criminal laws for areas within federal jurisdiction, is discussed more fully, infra, p. 1309.
Plaintiff Pueblo and…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Altheimer & Gray, a Partnership v. Sioux Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Penobscot Indian Nation v. Key Bank of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- The United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians v. The State of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Davis Moss, District Attorney of Tulsa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Sycuan Band of Mission Indians v. RoacheDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1992
- Catskill Development, L.L.C. v. Park Place Entertainment Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.