Legal Opinion

Luf v. Town of Southbury

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 14, 1982PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

This is an action seeking to recover damages from a town for its lawful discontinuance of an unimproved public highway. The plaintiffs, Arthur B. and Nellie Luf; Fred B. Rosnick; James H. W. Conklin II, administrator of the estate of Francis Hicock Harris; and Gus J. and Elaine Procopian, beneficiaries of the estate of Francis Hicock Harris, are owners of or have an actionable interest in land abutting East Hill Road, the discontinued road. They allege that the action of the defendant, the town of Southbury, was in legal effect a constitutional taking of their property for which the defendant…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Double I Ltd. Partnership v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Citino v. Redevelopment AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  4. Fuller v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  5. Property Group, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API