Legal Opinion

Clore v. McIntire

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1889No. 13,868PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Parke Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The appellee describes himself in his complaint as the administrator of the estate of Rhoda Mc-Intire, deceased, and avers that he was appointed on the 22d day of October, 1886. He also avers that Rhoda Mclntire died intestate, leaving surviving her four children, George, Sallie, Lenora, and Harmon, and her husband, and that they are the next of kin and only heirs of the deceased. The facts pleaded as the cause of action, shortly stated, are these :

The appellee, his wife, Rhoda Mclntire, and their children were attending an agricultural fair, and were sitting in *263their vehicle, which was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Dickson v. . McCoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. Billman v. Indianapolis, Cincinnati & Lafayette RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis R. R. v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Korrady v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. NitscheIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Evansville Hoop & Stave Co. v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. CoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Smith v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API